Technology Can Transform Your Conference

Technology Can Transform Your Conference

The audience is king in communications. Whether giving a presentation, talking to the media, or writing a document, who matters most is the viewer, listener or reader. What do you want them to do, feel or say as a result of your communications?

How strange this is too often forgotten when organising a conference.

I am sure you have attended conferences where death by PowerPoint was a real possibility or panel discussions where the moderator runs out of time for the Q and A session with the audience.

Have a read of this article by Guardian journalist, Duncan Green entitled “Conference rage: How did awful panel discussions become the default format?

He says, “a badly run conference is not only a lost opportunity, but a waste of time. How can we improve them?”

He gives a lot of good ideas, but doesn’t mention how technology can really make a difference, putting the audience back in the driving seat.

Interactive web applications – the moderator’s friend.

This year, I have moderated or acted as Master of Ceremonies at a number of events organised by companies, trade federations and international organisations. Many of them used web applications, which asked the audience to give their view on the subject under discussion or as a way to take questions or comments during the Q and A.

Two of the most popular apps are wisembly.com and slido.com. They promise amazing conversations, using a collaborative platform to maximise interaction at events and meetings.

So how do they work?

The audience downloads the app on their tablet or IPhone, put in the event code and then can ask questions during the Q and A session or take part in “real time” polls. The results appear on a screen in the room.

Many people feel nervous asking a question, especially if not in their native language. They prefer the more anonymous way of asking digitally. The only disadvantage is that the moderator has to understand the question or comment, especially difficult if it includes acronyms. It has to be made clear also who on the panel should respond and of course the moderator can’t check back for clarification with the questioner.

However, the part I really like is that the event organisers can ask the audience questions before the panel discussion. The responses appear on the screen within a minute. It is like getting the election results in real time.

Have a watch of this video from slido.com

As the Master of Ceremonies at the Future of Europe’s Finances Conference in Brussels, I used it firstly to find out who was in the room. We provided a list: European Commission officials, industry, academics, or other.

In retrospect, NGOs should have had their own category and not been relegated to “other”. The NGO’s were quick to tell us that on Twitter – the advantage of a two-way social media conversation!

Brussels, Belgium – 25 September 2017
“The Future of Finances” conference.
Photo: European Commission / Ezequiel Scagnetti

We then went on to ask more specific questions.

The moderator can use the results of a survey in a number of ways either by using the answers to start the panel discussion or refer to them during the discussion. You can also use the survey questions as a transition technique between panels, particularly useful as people leave and come on to the platform.

If you are really brave, you can use the word wall. This is where you ask people to write the word that they most associate with the conference. You show the results at the end. Of course the moderator/MC has to go with the flow if some of the words are not those the organisers expected!

At every event where I have used these applications, the audience has responded with genuine enthusiasm. They create a buzz and make the audience feel that they are really part of the event, restored to their rightful position as event royalty.

Moderator, Facilitator and Master of Ceremonies: What is the Difference?

Moderator, Facilitator and Master of Ceremonies: What is the Difference?

A straw poll of colleagues and clients confirmed my view that people often confuse the different roles.

I frequently receive confused requests. Not so long ago, I was asked to moderate when in fact after some discussion the client and I agreed they needed instead a Master of Ceremonies. Another client contacted me to moderate, but in fact what they required was a Master of Ceremonies and facilitator.

When organizing an event, how do you make sure you get the right person for the right job?

Some broad definitions to keep in mind:

  • A moderator guides the discussion, often but not always in a panel format.
  • A Master of Ceremonies is responsible for the “show* – the whole event as it unrolls on the day.
  • A facilitator is responsible for a process – helping people make decisions and achieve results.

While there are differences in responsibilities, there is a common base of skills across the three roles: you need someone who is neutral, is a good listener, and is a clear and confident communicator.

The nuance is that the different roles require more of one skill over another. By understanding this difference, you can be sure that you have hired the right person for the right job. .

From my experience, here are the prerequisites.

The ideal Moderator:

  • Knowledgeable – knows enough about the key issues to guide the conversation and ask the thoughtful questions. They are not subject experts, but they know how to research the arguments and draw out the main points.
  • Probing – is confident about asking thought-provoking questions to ensure a stimulating and lively discussion.
  • Engaged and engaging – is constantly thinking about the audience needs, making sure the conversation is meaningful for them and prepared to inject humour when need be.
  • Outcome orientated – works with the organiser to ask the questions they want asked to get the results they want.

Top Tip: TV and radio journalists are naturally good at this as they are used to distilling complex information and asking questions in a linear and easily understandable way. Make sure though they realise they are working for you and no longer for their editors!

The ideal Master of Ceremonies:

  • Personable – knows how to build rapport with the audience so that they are engaged throughout the event. If the audience doesn’t like the personality of the MC, the success of the event will be compromised.
  • Energetic and enthusiastic – works the room so that the audience is engaged, entertained, and energized.
  • Quick-witted – picks up quickly on verbal cues and link seamlessly from one session to another.
  • Charismatic – has confidence, presence and impact.

Top Tip: You need to get the right personality for your audience. If you are organising a big event you may want an actor/celebrity/broadcast presenter. But be careful that it does not become all about them!

The ideal Facilitator:

  • Well prepared – works out a process and structure for the event to achieve a specific result.
  • Analytical – identifies clear goals and links group feedback to them.
  • Empathetic – listens well and support others when they lose focus
  • Perceptive – links the response of the participants to the process and knows when to lift energy levels.

Top Tip: You need to look for facilitators who have a background in training and leadership development.

If you are organising an event, then do work closely with your “ideal” moderator, MC and facilitator, bringing them in as early as possible in the process to advise on content and format. This will make sure that you can the outcome you want.

If you are interested in this blog, have a read of other blogs on moderating.

Taking the Stress out of Moderating

How to be the Perfect Panelist

Creating a Perfect Panel

Moderating with Macron